State markets
Commercial healthcare reimbursement by state
How each state compares with the national median for commercial negotiated rates.
State indexSnapshot Aug 2026
About the state index
The index compares commercial rates in each state with the national median for the same procedures (100 = national median). Alaska ranks first at 243 and Florida last at 78. Open a state to see payers, specialties and procedures.
Commercial reimbursement by state
Index vs the national median; sampled providers
| Rank | State | Index | % of Medicare | Providers | Codes | Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 243 | 366% | 329 | 228 | |
| 2 | Wisconsin | 159 | 225% | 869 | 228 | |
| 3 | Oregon | 147 | 206% | 809 | 228 | |
| 4 | Nebraska | 138 | 198% | 601 | 228 | |
| 5 | Wyoming | 136 | 203% | 271 | 114 | |
| 6 | South Dakota | 135 | 202% | 474 | 228 | |
| 7 | Washington | 133 | 212% | 873 | 228 | |
| 8 | Iowa | 128 | 195% | 716 | 228 | |
| 9 | North Dakota | 127 | 197% | 369 | 228 | |
| 10 | Minnesota | 126 | 167% | 853 | 228 | |
| 11 | Georgia | 125 | 188% | 978 | 228 | |
| 12 | Connecticut | 124 | 201% | 935 | 228 | |
| 13 | Massachusetts | 123 | 190% | 921 | 228 | |
| 14 | New Hampshire | 121 | 174% | 734 | 228 | |
| 15 | North Carolina | 115 | 175% | 1,009 | 228 | |
| 16 | Mississippi | 111 | 159% | 778 | 228 | |
| 17 | Idaho | 109 | 165% | 618 | 228 | |
| 18 | Vermont | 107 | 157% | 365 | 228 | |
| 19 | Colorado | 105 | 162% | 948 | 228 | |
| 20 | District of Columbia | 104 | 154% | 521 | 228 | |
| 21 | Hawaii | 102 | 138% | 524 | 227 | |
| 22 | New Jersey | 100 | 154% | 887 | 228 | |
| 23 | Maine | 100 | 148% | 647 | 228 | |
| 24 | Montana | 100 | 160% | 448 | 228 | |
| 25 | Utah | 100 | 154% | 818 | 228 | |
| 26 | Rhode Island | 99 | 148% | 632 | 228 | |
| 27 | Ohio | 99 | 156% | 937 | 228 | |
| 28 | Illinois | 97 | 144% | 889 | 228 | |
| 29 | Tennessee | 96 | 143% | 944 | 228 | |
| 30 | Pennsylvania | 96 | 143% | 892 | 228 | |
| 31 | Kansas | 96 | 147% | 790 | 228 | |
| 32 | Missouri | 94 | 146% | 952 | 228 | |
| 33 | New Mexico | 94 | 141% | 622 | 228 | |
| 34 | West Virginia | 93 | 146% | 608 | 228 | |
| 35 | California | 93 | 138% | 844 | 228 | |
| 36 | Arkansas | 93 | 144% | 788 | 228 | |
| 37 | New York | 93 | 132% | 942 | 228 | |
| 38 | South Carolina | 92 | 140% | 872 | 228 | |
| 39 | Virginia | 91 | 139% | 907 | 228 | |
| 40 | Michigan | 90 | 145% | 898 | 228 | |
| 41 | Louisiana | 89 | 132% | 917 | 228 | |
| 42 | Kentucky | 88 | 133% | 977 | 228 | |
| 43 | Nevada | 87 | 128% | 780 | 228 | |
| 44 | Alabama | 87 | 128% | 953 | 228 | |
| 45 | Delaware | 87 | 129% | 463 | 228 | |
| 46 | Maryland | 86 | 129% | 849 | 228 | |
| 47 | Indiana | 86 | 131% | 962 | 228 | |
| 48 | Arizona | 83 | 122% | 820 | 228 | |
| 49 | Oklahoma | 80 | 114% | 836 | 228 | |
| 50 | Texas | 78 | 114% | 1,021 | 228 | |
| 51 | Florida | 78 | 119% | 896 | 228 |
Methodology
How these numbers are calculated
- Source: in-network negotiated-rate files published under the federal Transparency in Coverage rule, August 2026 snapshot: UnitedHealthcare Choice plans (74 files); Aetna commercial plans (70 files); Cigna national PPO (1 files); BCBS licensees' own-network files (5,387 files). Payer comparisons describe these files, not each payer's entire book of business.
- Sample: rates come from a random sample of up to 150 providers per state and specialty. Counts on this page are sampled providers and TINs, not totals.
- Which providers count: only providers in a specialty relevant to the code, because a rate in a payer file attaches to a provider group and is listed under every provider in that group.
- Filters: fee-for-service, professional billing class, no modifier, negotiated or fee-schedule dollar rates. Rates outside 1% to 1,000% of the Medicare rate are excluded.
- Statistic: one median rate per provider, then percentiles across providers. A cell is shown only with at least 15 sampled providers and 4 TINs.
- Medicare benchmark: CY2026 national physician fee schedule, non-QPP conversion factor, unadjusted for locality. Where the non-facility rate is more than twice the facility rate (office rates that include device or supply cost), the facility rate is used so comparisons are like for like.
Benchmark your state contracts
Compare your rates with these state medians.