CPT 23472 · professional fee

Reconstruct shoulder joint (CPT 23472): negotiated rates by payer and state

What UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Cigna and Blue Cross Blue Shield pay for CPT 23472, from their published in-network rate files.

Orthopedic surgerySnapshot Aug 2026Professional fee only

National summary

Commercial in-network, four payers combined, professional fee
Median rate
$2,318
P10 to P90: $1,489 to $4,096
vs Medicare
178%
non-facility rate $1,300.30
Payer spread
1.35×
UHC $2,567 vs Aetna $1,906
State spread
3.7×
AK $6,424 to TX $1,738
5,036 sampled providers6,081 TINs51 statesSample-based · how this is calculated

What the data shows

Generated from this code's own numbers
1

UnitedHealthcare has the highest median for CPT 23472 in the files analyzed, at $2,567, 35% above Aetna ($1,906), the lowest of the 4 payers shown.

2

The state spread is 3.7×: Alaska has the highest median at $6,424 and Texas the lowest at $1,738, a gap larger than the gap between the highest and lowest payer.

3

Commercial rates run 178% of the Medicare non-facility rate ($1,300.30), which ranks 71st of 228 tracked codes by commercial-to-Medicare ratio.

4

Rates are tightest within Aetna (interquartile range $872) and widest within UnitedHealthcare ($1,435).

5

This is a top-8 code for orthopedic surgery by Medicare allowed dollars, so it carries real revenue weight for that specialty.

Rates by payer

Median of per-provider median rates, with interquartile range
PayerMedianP25P75vs nationalRankProvidersPosition
UnitedHealthcare$2,567$1,950$3,385+11%14,263
197% of Medicare
Cigna$2,411$1,925$3,125+4%24,049
185% of Medicare
Blue Cross Blue Shield$2,346$1,770$2,934+1%33,861
180% of Medicare
Aetna$1,906$1,504$2,377-18%42,942
147% of Medicare

Rate distribution

Box = P25 to P75, whiskers = P10 to P90, tick = median, dashed line = Medicare non-facility ($1,300.30)
$1,170$1,926$2,683$3,439$4,195$4,951UnitedHealthcareCignaBlue Cross Blue ShieldAetnaMedicare

Rates by state

Median across payers · 51 states with enough data
RankStateMedianvs nationalHighest payerLowest payerProvidersLevel
1Alaska$6,424+177%AetnaBCBS63
2Wisconsin$3,528+52%BCBSAetna92
3Wyoming$3,328+44%BCBSUHC65
4South Dakota$3,298+42%UHCCigna97
5Connecticut$3,109+34%UHCAetna114
6New Jersey$3,085+33%UHCAetna95
7Washington$3,081+33%UHCAetna101
8District of Columbia$3,074+33%AetnaBCBS35
9Iowa$3,052+32%UHCBCBS104
10Mississippi$2,985+29%AetnaCigna112
11Nebraska$2,910+26%CignaBCBS95
12North Dakota$2,870+24%BCBSAetna45
13Oregon$2,830+22%UHCAetna92
14Massachusetts$2,737+18%UHCAetna111
15Georgia$2,652+14%UHCBCBS124
16Tennessee$2,650+14%BCBSAetna114
17North Carolina$2,618+13%CignaAetna128
18Rhode Island$2,567+11%UHCAetna98
19Vermont$2,496+8%UHCBCBS35
20Idaho$2,446+6%AetnaUHC120
21Illinois$2,377+3%UHCBCBS103
22Colorado$2,346+1%UHCAetna106
23Alabama$2,320+0%BCBSCigna118
24Montana$2,284-1%UHCCigna79
25South Carolina$2,274-2%BCBSAetna106
26Arkansas$2,261-2%CignaAetna119
27Maryland$2,258-3%UHCBCBS105
28New Hampshire$2,257-3%CignaAetna118
29Kansas$2,232-4%CignaAetna108
30New York$2,226-4%CignaAetna110
31Virginia$2,179-6%UHCBCBS105
32New Mexico$2,167-7%UHCBCBS104
33Utah$2,127-8%UHCBCBS96
34West Virginia$2,114-9%UHCAetna87
35Pennsylvania$2,088-10%UHCAetna103
36Arizona$2,044-12%UHCAetna99
37Delaware$2,039-12%CignaBCBS59
38Maine$2,034-12%UHCAetna93
39Kentucky$2,033-12%UHCAetna124
40Ohio$2,022-13%UHCAetna110
41Louisiana$2,019-13%BCBSAetna103
42Michigan$2,019-13%BCBSUHC102
43Missouri$2,012-13%UHCAetna112
44Nevada$1,997-14%BCBSAetna108
45Indiana$1,862-20%UHCAetna115
46Minnesota$1,840-21%UHCAetna98
47Florida$1,836-21%BCBSAetna108
48California$1,815-22%CignaAetna109
49Hawaii$1,796-23%BCBSCigna68
50Oklahoma$1,742-25%UHCAetna100
51Texas$1,738-25%UHCAetna121

Frequently asked questions

Answers use this page's data
Which payer has the highest median rate for CPT 23472?

In the files we analyzed, UnitedHealthcare, at a median of $2,567 across 4,263 sampled providers. Aetna is lowest at $1,906, 35% lower than the highest.

How does the commercial rate compare with Medicare?

The national median is 178% of the 2026 Medicare non-facility rate of $1,300.30.

Which state has the highest median for CPT 23472?

Alaska has the highest median at $6,424; Texas has the lowest at $1,738.

Is this the surgeon, physician or facility payment?

These are professional (physician) fees only. Facility, device and implant payments are priced separately and are not included.

How current is this data?

It is the August 2026 snapshot of each payer's in-network rate file. Sources and filters are listed in the methodology below.

Methodology

How these numbers are calculated
  • Source: in-network negotiated-rate files published under the federal Transparency in Coverage rule, August 2026 snapshot: UnitedHealthcare Choice plans (74 files); Aetna commercial plans (70 files); Cigna national PPO (1 files); BCBS licensees' own-network files (5,387 files). Payer comparisons describe these files, not each payer's entire book of business.
  • Sample: rates come from a random sample of up to 150 providers per state and specialty. Counts on this page are sampled providers and TINs, not totals.
  • Which providers count: only providers in a specialty relevant to the code, because a rate in a payer file attaches to a provider group and is listed under every provider in that group.
  • Filters: fee-for-service, professional billing class, no modifier, negotiated or fee-schedule dollar rates. Rates outside 1% to 1,000% of the Medicare rate are excluded.
  • Statistic: one median rate per provider, then percentiles across providers. A cell is shown only with at least 15 sampled providers and 4 TINs.
  • Medicare benchmark: CY2026 national physician fee schedule, non-QPP conversion factor, unadjusted for locality. Where the non-facility rate is more than twice the facility rate (office rates that include device or supply cost), the facility rate is used so comparisons are like for like.

See how your contracts compare for CPT 23472

Benchmark your negotiated rates for 23472 and the rest of your book against these payer and state medians.

Request a rate benchmark