Gastroenterology · specialty benchmark

Gastroenterology commercial reimbursement benchmarks

What commercial payers pay for the procedures that matter most to gastroenterology practices.

Gastroenterology at a glance

4,463 sampled providers
Codes tracked
36
publishable codes
Median % of Medicare
184%
across codes
Highest state
AK
Alaska
Highest payer
UHC
UnitedHealthcare

What the data shows

1

Gastroenterology rates in this dataset cover 36 procedure codes and 4,463 sampled providers in 51 states, at a median 184% of Medicare.

2

Alaska has the highest gastroenterology index and Nevada the lowest.

3

UnitedHealthcare has the highest gastroenterology index and Aetna the lowest.

4

The biggest revenue code by Medicare allowed dollars is CPT 45385 (Colonoscopy w/lesion removal), paid at a 556-dollar median, 249% of Medicare.

Top gastroenterology codes by Medicare revenue

Ranked by Medicare allowed dollars billed by the specialty
RankCodeMedianMedicare% of MedicareProviders
1CPT 45385
Colonoscopy w/lesion removal
$556$223.45249%4,444
2CPT 99214
Office o/p est mod 30 min
$132$135.6197%4,445
3CPT 43239
Egd biopsy single/multiple
$349$123.58283%4,401
4CPT 45380
Colonoscopy and biopsy
$470$177.69264%4,439
5CPT 99204
Office o/p new mod 45 min
$194$177.36109%4,446
6CPT 99213
Office o/p est low 20 min
$90$95.1995%4,445
10CPT 99203
Office o/p new low 30 min
$124$117.57106%4,445
12CPT 45378
Diagnostic colonoscopy
$408$164.67248%4,443
13CPT 99215
Office o/p est hi 40 min
$185$192.3996%4,444
14CPT 43235
Egd diagnostic brush wash
$294$110.56266%4,438

Gastroenterology by payer

Index: 100 = four-payer median for the specialty's codes
PayerIndexRankLevelHighest on
UnitedHealthcare1161
89%
Blue Cross Blue Shield1002
11%
Cigna1003
0%
Aetna784
0%

Gastroenterology by state

Index: 100 = the specialty's national median
RankStateIndexLevelCodesProviders
1Alaska229
3616
2Oregon188
36104
3Wisconsin179
36110
4Nebraska141
3646
5Minnesota141
3691
6Connecticut136
36122
7New Hampshire134
3675
8Washington134
3697
9Massachusetts122
36114
10Georgia121
36127
11North Dakota118
3620
12Iowa117
3657
13Mississippi115
3693
14North Carolina115
36124
15Idaho115
3652
16South Dakota110
3625
17Hawaii109
3647
18New Jersey107
36116
19Vermont105
3626
20District of Columbia105
3651
21Tennessee103
36110
22Utah102
3688
23Colorado98
36126
24New Mexico98
3658
25New York98
36131
26Pennsylvania98
36115
27Ohio96
36123
28Missouri96
36135
29Alabama96
36115
30Kansas96
3662
31Maine95
3653
32Illinois95
36115
33Louisiana94
36123
34Kentucky93
36124
35South Carolina93
36118
36Arizona93
3698
37Indiana92
36110
38Virginia91
36118
39Montana90
3628
40California90
36108
41Maryland89
36110
42Rhode Island87
3666
43Florida87
36121
44West Virginia86
3649
45Delaware85
3629
46Arkansas84
3681
47Michigan84
36114
48Oklahoma79
3698
49Texas76
36132
50Nevada76
3684

Methodology

How these numbers are calculated
  • Source: in-network negotiated-rate files published under the federal Transparency in Coverage rule, August 2026 snapshot: UnitedHealthcare Choice plans (74 files); Aetna commercial plans (70 files); Cigna national PPO (1 files); BCBS licensees' own-network files (5,387 files). Payer comparisons describe these files, not each payer's entire book of business.
  • Sample: rates come from a random sample of up to 150 providers per state and specialty. Counts on this page are sampled providers and TINs, not totals.
  • Which providers count: only providers in a specialty relevant to the code, because a rate in a payer file attaches to a provider group and is listed under every provider in that group.
  • Filters: fee-for-service, professional billing class, no modifier, negotiated or fee-schedule dollar rates. Rates outside 1% to 1,000% of the Medicare rate are excluded.
  • Statistic: one median rate per provider, then percentiles across providers. A cell is shown only with at least 15 sampled providers and 4 TINs.
  • Medicare benchmark: CY2026 national physician fee schedule, non-QPP conversion factor, unadjusted for locality. Where the non-facility rate is more than twice the facility rate (office rates that include device or supply cost), the facility rate is used so comparisons are like for like.

Benchmark your gastroenterology contracts

See how your negotiated rates compare by code, payer and state.

Request a rate benchmark